In recent times, software development has become all about frameworks. Why? The main reason is that creating from scratch such a sophisticated program as a web application may take a lot of time and efforts. Don’t take it wrong – I mean not the “Hello World” type of apps but those that provide excellent user experience and are ready for production.
This is where frameworks come in. In IT, they provide essential structure and functionality to ease and fasten the development of various applications (including web applications). In web development, we have a lot of options: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Django, ASP.NET, etc. All of them are fastly growing and competing with each other.
The Internet space is crowded with forum discussions, posts, and articles that aim to find the best framework and technology, which, in fact, is an impossible task. Apparently, every web developer or web development team should choose the most suitable framework individually.
Node.js was written in 2009 by Ryan Dahl, and since then the framework has been growing and gaining more popularity among developers and clients. Companies that use Node.js as a software development tool include LinkedIn, Airbnb, Uber, NASA, etc.
Ruby on Rails
Ruby on Rails is an MVC (model-view-controller) framework written in Ruby that has become one of the most popular tools for developing web applications. It follows such software design paradigms as “convention over configuration” and “don’t repeat yourself”.
Ruby on Rails was released in 2004 by David Hansson. The community of Ruby on Rails developers is rapidly growing, and new updates are coming out every year. The list of companies that use Ruby on Rails as a software development tool has such names as Crunchbase, GitHub, Goodreads, etc.
Pros and cons
The engineering VP of Joyent, a software company that provides support for enterprises that use Node.js, Bryan Cantrill said that Node.js “is not simply a new programming environment or the latest shiny object, but rather a profound shift in server-side programming towards event-oriented systems…”
However, even those cons that seem to be undeniable usually have their downsides. Let’s explore them!
- flexible project structure
- doesn’t fit CPU intensive tasks
- frequent API changes
- lots of callbacks
In Ruby on Rails vs Node.js performance battle, the latter wins. First of all, Node.js is fast because it runs on Google V8 engine, which is tailored specifically to the needs of dynamic languages. Second, Node.js has asynchronous nature, which implies that there’s no waiting until one request is finished. Instead, you have them all running in a parallel fashion.
The possibility to run numerous tasks at the same time also makes possible creation of scalable applications with Node.js. (Though it’s not limitless because it’s not scalability in its traditional meaning, which is usually achieved by increasing the number of CPU cores).
Some developers find the flexibility of project structure advantageous. If you want you can make it MVC-like or any other way you want. This freedom also has its disadvantages. If the project is big and involves many developers, it may take more efforts to make code structure clear and understandable. Besides, numerous callback functions also help to mess up things, especially for those developers who come from object-oriented languages.
Developers also stress instability of API as an obvious pitfall. The thing is that API is frequently changing, and a new version turns out to be incompatible with the previous one. It’s incredibly inconvenient for large projects as it requires to do a lot of additional work to make things function properly.
Ruby on Rails
Ruby on Rails is loved because of its strictness. There’s a less possibility to make an error when the framework automatically does for you things that you could have easily messed up.
- saves time
- provides sufficient security
- great fit for CRUD applications
Unlike Node.js, Ruby on Rails is strict about the structure of applications one can develop by using it. It’s based on MVC model, which means that you get a strong frame at the start. It comes with numerous advantages, such as faster development and cleaner code.
Ruby on Rails is also an excellent fit for CRUD applications. It has extensive built-in functionality that allows doing all main configurations and having a fully-functional CRUD application with minimum code. Another nice thing about working with data in Rails is that database migrations are performed automatically, and you can easily track what has happened.
Also, some developers find the development of web applications in Rails quite tricky when it comes to large projects due to a lot of background processes that are not obvious to developers.
Finally, if we were to compare Ruby on Rails vs Node.js scalability, it turns out that they both are quite scalable, though in different fashion – Rails applications scale horizontally while Node.js apps scale mostly vertically.